Service guide
Thailand runs a national screening mechanism that can grant protected person status. What the framework is, what it does not do, and where a lawyer helps.
0 firms on Justenda.
Talk to someone who does this every week. Verified firms reply with how they would handle your case and what it costs. Free, no account needed.
For a long time the practical answer for someone seeking protection in Thailand involved no Thai legal status at all. That has changed on paper. Thailand has a national screening framework, established by a Regulation of the Office of the Prime Minister on the screening of aliens who enter the Kingdom and are unable to return to their country of origin, made in B.E. 2562 (2019).
Under that framework a screening committee determines whether a person is granted the status of protected person. The Royal Gazette carries the committee's notification prescribing the forms used: an identification document for a person under screening, the form for determining protected person status, and the fingerprint form. The identification document states on its face that the holder is under protection in accordance with clause 19 of the Regulation.
That is what can be said with confidence from the official record: the framework exists, it produces a defined status, and it issues documents. What it will do in an individual case is a different question, and it is not one a page can answer.
Warning: Immigration law does not switch off while a claim is considered
A protection claim and immigration status are separate things. The Immigration Act continues to govern entry, presence, detention and removal, and its penalties for staying without permission still exist. Someone in a protection situation can also be in an immigration one at the same time, which is why these matters are usually handled together rather than in sequence.
Firms
We do not have a verified firm specifically tagged for asylum & refugee claims yet. You can still browse the wider Thailand directory.
Browse all firmsThe work is careful rather than dramatic. It starts with establishing the person's actual position: how they entered, what status if any they hold, what has been said to officials already, and whether any order has been made against them. Statements matter here more than in most work, because immigration officials conduct inquiries with the powers of an inquiry official under the Criminal Procedure Code.
From there it is preparation. A protection claim rests on the person's own account and on whatever can be corroborated, and the quality of that record is largely what a lawyer contributes. Documents, chronology, consistency, and translation.
Running alongside is the immigration position. If detention is in prospect, the detention limits in the Immigration Act apply in the ordinary way, and continued detention beyond the administrative period needs a court order. If a removal order has been made, the appeal routes and their forty-eight hour deadlines apply. A firm doing this work properly is holding both tracks at once.
What a lawyer cannot do is promise a status. The determination sits with the screening committee, and no firm controls it.
Establish the immigration position first
Entry route, current status, any order served, any statement already given. This decides what is urgent, because immigration deadlines run whether or not a protection claim exists.
Assess the protection question honestly
A lawyer looks at the account and the available evidence and tells you what it does and does not support. An early honest assessment is more useful than an optimistic one.
Prepare the record
Chronology, documents, corroboration, and certified translation where the material is not in Thai. This is the part that most affects how a claim is understood.
Handle detention if it arises
The Immigration Act's detention limits apply, and continued detention beyond the administrative period requires an application to the Court.
Keep the two tracks aligned
Anything filed on the immigration side has to be consistent with the protection account, and vice versa. Inconsistency between the two is the avoidable problem in these cases.
Protection work is the area where the gap between what people are told and what the official record supports is widest. This page therefore says less than most: the framework exists, it is set out in a Prime Minister's Office Regulation and the Royal Gazette notification made under it, and it produces a defined status with its own documents.
It deliberately makes no claim about who qualifies, how long a determination takes, or what proportion of claims succeed, because no source available on the public record supports those statements. Anyone quoting you such figures should be asked where they come from.
On fees, firms set their own and the work is hard to scope in advance, so protection matters are usually billed hourly rather than as a fixed fee. Some firms take this work at reduced rates or through partner organisations. No credible published source gives professional fee ranges, so ask directly what a firm charges and what it covers before engaging.
Protection matters overlap heavily with the rest of immigration practice: immigration proceedings for the forums involved, overstay and deportation defence where removal is in play, and the broader immigration lawyer in Thailand practice.
This page is general information, not legal advice. Protection claims turn entirely on individual facts, and nothing here should be relied on for a specific situation. Speak with a qualified professional.
Common questions
Practical explainers on this topic: general information, not professional advice.
Immigration
The report belongs to whoever controls the accommodation, not the foreigner staying in it. Who files a TM30, the 24 hour deadline, the four official channels, and what happens when nobody does.
In this practice area